Ps. 22: Feeling God-forsaken

Jon M. Sweeney is the author of The Pope Who Quit, optioned by HBO, The Pope’s Cat series for children, and The Complete Francis of Assisi, which is used by Third Order Franciscans everywhere. He lives in Milwaukee with his wife, Rabbi Michal Woll, and their children.


Blaming God has as rich a history as does praising God. But “blaming” is the wrong gerund, since it connotes fault on the part of the speaker, as in, I did not intend to blame you… Better verbs with an object for explaining what we think of as God’s inactivity would be “criticizing” or “disapproving.” Dare we disapprove of God? I think so; and there’s a long history of it. Disapproving of God is, in fact, what Psalm 22 sings. It is a protest ballad of criticism of the Divine. And why not? Where the hell is God, anyway?

Even Jesus criticizes God—with the first line of this Psalm—calling out from the cross as he is dying: “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me!” (New Revised Standard Version). The rest of verse 1, and all of verse 2, are an indictment of God’s silence: “Why are you so far from helping me, from the words of my groaning? O my God, I cry by day, but you do not answer; and by night, but find no rest.” These are the words of a friend or companion—only one intimate with God would care enough to speak this way—but a deeply disappointed friend.

This is supposed to be one of King David’s psalms, and the psalmist is a realist. “You are holy … But I am worm,” he juxtaposes from verses 3 to 6. In other words, I get it: we’re a universe apart, and yet, we’re not a universe apart because, “It was you who took me from the womb” (verse 9). You made me. You brought me here. This was your idea. And now you ignore me?! Were you just playing around?

Christians have long wrestled with the humanness of Jesus. The late second century CE Docetists (from a Greek word literally meaning “Illusionists”) were particularly insistent in their argument against this notion. They contended that the human form of Jesus was an illusion, that he was always, while walking around on earth, all-God. To my knowledge, there are no Docetists today, and yet, in my experience Christians still too easily see everything Jesus did and said as part of a grand cosmic plan. The gymnastics we undergo to explain this scream from the cross can be extreme—and part of our own illusion.

One might expect that Jesus—an observant Jew and a teacher (rabbi)—would have said the Sh’ma or another doxological statement on the cross when faced with his imminent death, but he didn’t. Or, if he was wanting to draw from Psalm 22, a favorite, one might think he would have chosen one of the many lines that affirms the sovereignty of God despite the experience of God’s silence that he seems to have been experiencing in those frightful last moments: “Dominion belongs to the Lord!” (verse 28) or “Before him shall bow all who go down to the dust!” (verse 29). But he didn’t do that, either. He cried, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me!” This wasn’t according to a plan.

There are among us many who criticize God, and it also isn’t according to plan. A spouse dies, and we scream. A child dies, and we curse. Calamity falls all around us and we say, was it a game, rather than a plan, that you began when you created us?

I know that there have long been arguments against the divinity of Jesus based on this Psalm, for similar reasons to what I’ve been discussing here. God wouldn’t cry out to God, the arguments go. My intention isn’t to address these, or to argue at all, but simply to say God is inscrutable. There are many times in the Hebrew Scriptures when God changes God’s mind, when God is pliable, when God displays surprising emotion. Whether you are Christian or Jew, or neither, you have surely had moments in your life when you somehow knew this God (by any number of names) more profoundly than the God who is a master planner and implementor. 

As a Catholic married to a congregational rabbi, I’m often uncomfortable when Christians re-appropriate Jewish religious metaphors without acknowledging that these existing images and symbols remain valuable to a whole other community of God seekers. Take, for example, the widespread notion that Christ is the slain Passover lamb (see St. Paul’s declaration in 1 Corinthians 5:7). I can understand how it might be offensive to Jews that this ancient and animating redemptive image has been aggressively revamped by Christians, who have too often denied the integrity of Judaism and actively oppressed Jewish people.  

Similarly, the Renaissance-era English poet John Donne, in a sermon preached at St. Paul’s Cathedral, once called the Psalms “the manna of the church.” But this strikes me as less offending—that the spiritual riches of one tradition have the power to instruct, minister to, and nourish (those are Donne’s words) to the people of another tradition.1 This is what I often receive from the riches of Judaism, ancient or contemporary, and for which I am deeply thankful. In the case of Psalm 22, one thing I am particularly grateful for is the biblical and later Jewish sensibility that wrestling with God is a holy act, and that it can be combined productively with due praise, as part of a holistic religious life.  

 1John Donne, Sermon 156, preached at St. Paul’s, January 29, 1625.


Read more about the PsalmSeason here & subscribe for email updates.

If you are looking for a way to become an interfaith leader, work for racial equity and build bridges, please check out our free curriculum "We Are Each Other's" and start your interfaith leadership today

more from IFYC

"99.8% of U.S. deaths are of the unvaccinated. If you heard of an airline of that percentage dying, whereas a 0.02% on another, you’re switching flights." -- Dr. Jimmie Smith, Macon-Bibb County Health Department, Georgia.
As a scholar of religious studies, I frequently use critical race theory as a tool to better understand how religion operates in American society.
Inspired by their faith, four LDS students built new study resource that has revolutionized how hundreds of thousands of aspiring physicians study for their exams. "It really started because we just wanted to help people," one said.
We're now in one of the holiest seasons of the year for one of smallest and oldest religions in India -- one with a long history in the United States.
Organizing on-campus vaccination clinics, calling thousands of students, hosting informational webinars with medical experts – these are some of the ways in which IFYC’s Faith in the Vaccine Ambassadors (FIVA) have been raising awareness around the COVID-19 vaccine on campuses and high-need communities across the nation.
Last year's winners, listed below, created a range of initiatives, from virtual retreats and criminal justice initiatives to book clubs and racial equity workshops.
Religious objections, once used sparingly around the country to get exempted from various required vaccines, are becoming a much more widely used loophole against the COVID-19 shot.
What will the campus chapel, and the chaplaincy, look like more than a century from now? Let the adventure begin.
The issue is not the presence of religion in the public square. Instead, the question before us is how to express those religious commitments within in a pluralistic society.
We don’t know what the year 5782 – as it is in the Hebrew calendar – has in store for any of us. But we have the power to act in a way to do right by each other and bring a little more peace and love and joy into this profoundly broken world.
The following interview features Dr. Toby Bressler, senior director of nursing for oncology and clinical quality at the Mount Sinai Health System and vice president of the Orthodox Jewish Nurses Association.
Part of what I found so beautiful about our conversation is that we both agree that American pluralism is not simply a pragmatic solution to the challenge of a diverse democracy, it is also a kind of sacred trust that God intends us to steward.
After 9/11, there was increased intentionality in widening interfaith relations to include a broader number of faith groups and discussions. Twenty years later, it is not unusual to see interreligious conferences, joint advocacy efforts and disaster relief teamwork involving faith groups ranging from Adventists to Zoroastrians.
Twenty years later, we at IFYC, like so many others, collect the shards of memory, recollecting, reconstituting the trauma and horror of that day. And the sacredness is in doing so together.
As we approach this significant anniversary of 9/11, we must work to infuse the day with purpose and pluralism. Pay it Forward 9/11 is bringing people together to do 20,000 good deeds for the 20th anniversary.
In the first month since 9/11, The Sikh Coalition documented over 300 cases of violence and religious discrimination against Sikhs in the U.S. and has since grown to become the largest Sikh advocacy and civil rights organization in the country.
“If you were to quiz these students on what happened on 9/11, they think they knew what happened, but nobody really explained it to them,” Lisa Doi said. “I had to think through, how do you teach this history to somebody who doesn’t really remember it?”
My prayer is that for as long as we remember 9/11, that we will take time to listen to the stories of loss that break our hearts, and join together in finding ways to heal the division, violence and hate that continue to tear apart our world.
It has been 20 years, but the pain of that day is still present in so many places.
20 years after the 9/11 attacks, four remarkable people took profound suffering, loss and grief and “somehow managed to not center enemies. What can we learn from that? How can that be a teaching to the culture?”
Now the entire planet is our garden, and Rosh Hashana is our chance to remember that we are all descended from the original gardeners — that we are here, each of one us, to tend our chosen plots as best we can.

The opinions contained in this piece are solely the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the views of Interfaith Youth Core. Interfaith America encourages a wide range of views and strives to maintain a respectful tone with a goal of greater understanding and cooperation between people of different faiths, worldviews, and traditions.