Join the Network to Access Resources

Join the Network

Already Joined?

Already joined?

Book Discussion Guide: Out of Many Faiths: Religious Diversity and the American Promise

By Eboo Patel (Princeton University Press, 2018)

  • “Expressive Symbolism has the power to divide or unite, and the future of our pluralism depends in large part on what we publicly embrace.” (Intro Page xviii). Earl Lewis and Nancy Cantor mention some of these symbols in their Introduction. Discuss: 
    • What are some public symbols you feel divide society in this moment in time?  
    • What are some public symbols you feel that reinforce unity?  
    • If the future of pluralism depends on what symbols we publicly embrace, who decides what the ‘right’ symbols are? 
    • Do symbols associated with religion carry special peril or promise?  

 

  • Patel writes: “If American democracy depends on the vibrancy of our civic life, and if our civic life depends at least in part on the contributions of religious communities, then it would seem self-evident that facilitating such participation is a compelling interest for American democracy.” (Page 15) For this to happen, Patel asserts that we have to make the following commitments, listed below. In small groups, pick one of the commitments and discuss ideas for actions that you, your campus or your community could take to further it: 
    • Guard against religious preference and establishment and continue the American ideal of free exercise for all faith communities 
    • Develop a national narrative that is inclusive of our new social reality of high levels of religious diversity.  
    • Reduce prejudice and openly welcome the myriad contributions of multiple communities (civic, professional, cultural, and so on).  
    • Facilitate positive relations between diverse religious communities, guarding against conflict and strengthening social cohesion.  
    • Encourage particular religious communities to harmonize their distinctive traditions with national ideals such as civic participation and pluralism.

 

  • Patel poses the question, “if religious language and symbols play a significant role in American civil religion, and if America is getting more religiously diverse, then how will other religious vocabularies and experiences be incorporated into our evolving civil religion?” (Page 25). Discuss.  

 

  • In discussing the concept of civil religion, Patel asserts: “If the challenge of the diverse society is to embrace its differences and maintain a common life, the challenge of the particular religious community is to embrace the nation’s common life while maintaining its difference.” (Page 27). 
    • Discuss what it would mean for a particular religious community to embrace the nation’s “common life” while maintaining “its difference.”  
    • Can you think of a religious community that finds friction when trying to maintain their difference while embracing the nation’s common life?  

 

  • Patel says “lest anyone think that my desire for religious communities to harmonize their identities with America’s ideals and traditions is a call for conformity, let me remind you that the American tradition celebrates dissenters of all stripes.” (Page 27).  Patel mentions several dissenters who have played important roles in American civil religion. Choose one of the people below, explore that individual’s story, and tell your group how they came to be a part of American civil religion, despite or because of their faith-inspired dissent. Then consider who you might add to the list: 
    • Roger Williams  
    • Anne Hutchinson  
    • Jane Addams 
    • Woody Guthrie 
    • Dorothy Day  

 

  • Patel asks: “If the dynamics of American religious diversity changed so vastly in the past, through the launch of a new civil religion narrative in the form of the “Judeo-Christian” ideal and efforts to align the national reality with the new ideal, can a similar process occur again? And what might that look like now, when Muslims are the group around which controversy swirls?” (Page 73). Discuss.  

 

  • On pages 80-84, Patel discusses Aziz Ansari, a highly successful actor, writer, stand-up comic, and director born to Indian Muslim parents. In the “Religion” episode of his Netflix series Master of None, the comic visualizes parallels between the observant Muslim that his parents believe him to be and the not-so-observant Muslim life he actually lives. Patel says that “on the one hand, this is terrific. Not only does it add to the voices speaking out against Islamophobia, it increases the number of non-terrorist Muslims that Americans can identify.” He also goes on to point out a parallel: “What do observant Muslims do when one of the most prominent defenders of Muslims in the public square is producing shows that encourage Muslims to skip Eid to go eat pork at a barbeque festival and suggesting that the fellowship of a wine tasting is comparable to the fellowship at jummah prayers?”  
    • Discuss the tensions between Ansari using his far-reaching, public platform to combat the ‘Muslim as a “threat”’ stereotype, but in a way that suggests he doesn’t always take the rituals and traditions of the religion seriously.  

 

  • The book contains lengthy responses from three prominent scholars of religion in American public life. Consider what your own response might say. What points from Patel's book might you want to highlight or disagree with?